PaulRoebuck.co.uk
IMG_0178.jpg

Blog

Paul Roebuck | Blog, Articles and Thought Leadership about Human Behaviour, Psychology, Neuroscience, and a whole manner of topics.

Not Good Enough, or Never My Fault? Why the answer tells you everything about how you behave under pressure.

Not Good Enough, or Never My Fault?

Why the answer tells you everything about how you behave under pressure.

Let me start with something that might be uncomfortable.

There are two types of people. Not by personality, not by diagnosis, not by how they present on a good day. By what happens inside them when things go wrong. When they fail. When they’re criticised. When they feel, even for a moment, that they aren’t enough.

I’ve spent thirty years in boardrooms and therapy rooms watching this play out. And what I’ve learned is this: the difference isn’t what people feel in those moments. It’s where that feeling goes.

Two directions. One driver.

Call the driver what you want. Inadequacy. Threat. The sense that something is wrong — with me, with this situation, with how I’m being seen. It’s not quite a feeling. It’s a state. A sudden shift in internal weather. You’ll know it when it hits you — that tightening, that alertness, that moment before you react.

What happens next is where people divide.

Some people turn it inward. The voice that speaks is self-critical. I should have done better. I missed something. Why didn’t I see that? They absorb the threat into themselves. Nothing is ever quite right, including them. I call this NGE — Not Good Enough.

Some people turn it outward. The voice that speaks looks for cause elsewhere. That wasn’t handled properly. The brief was wrong. I wasn’t given what I needed. They redirect the threat away from themselves. Failure is real, but it’s never quite here — it’s always over there. I call this FOF — Fear of Failure. Or more precisely: Not My Fault.

Neither is a character flaw. Both are learned. Both, in the right context, are extraordinary strengths.

The continuum. This is the revelation.

Here’s what I didn’t say clearly enough when I first wrote about this. It isn’t a binary. It’s a spectrum.

Strong NGE at one end. Strong FOF at the other. And the rest of us — most of us — somewhere in between, with a default lean in one direction and the capacity to move depending on pressure, context, and how well-rested we are.

That matters. Because it means this isn’t about labelling yourself or anyone else. It’s about calibration. Where do you sit? What does that position produce in you? And crucially — when pressure increases, which way do you move?

The extremes are where it gets costly. A strong NGE under sustained pressure will eventually collapse inward — rumination, paralysis, burnout. A strong FOF under sustained pressure will eventually fortify outward — blame, defensiveness, isolation. Both are protection strategies. Both work, until they don’t.

The middle of that spectrum — where someone can absorb challenge without collapsing, and deflect genuine unfairness without becoming unreachable — that’s where the most effective people operate. Not because they feel less. Because they’ve developed range.

Chapman. Ferguson. NGE in plain sight.

Herbert Chapman managed Huddersfield Town to three consecutive league titles in the 1920s — the first time it had ever been done in English football. He then went to Arsenal and did it again. He revolutionised tactics, player welfare, training methodology. He died at 55, on the road in winter, still scouting.

He couldn’t stop. Not because he was driven by ego. Because nothing was ever quite finished. Never satisfied. Never at the summit long enough to rest. That is NGE at full stretch — the restlessness of a man who can always see where it could be better.

You don’t need to know football to recognise that. You’ve worked with someone like that. You might be someone like that.

Alex Ferguson is the same architecture. Thirty years at Manchester United, more trophies than any manager in British football history. The hairdryer moments — his famous explosive reactions when standards slipped — weren’t arrogance. They were NGE catching fire. This isn’t good enough. I know what good looks like and this isn’t it. An emotionally expressive man for whom excellence was personal.

Neither of these men were FOF. FOF doesn’t absorb criticism from a senior player and change the system. FOF doesn’t die still working. FOF protects. NGE pursues.

So where are you?

Think about the last time something went wrong at work. A decision, a result, a conversation that didn’t land.

What was your first internal move?

Not what you said. Not how you handled it publicly. The first internal move.

Did you look for what you had missed? Or did you immediately scan the environment for what had gone wrong around you?

There’s no right answer. Both responses are gathering information. The question is whether they’re gathering accurate information — or whether they’re running a default programme designed to protect a version of you that was formed a long time ago.

Because that’s where this originates. Not in your job title, not in your industry, not in last quarter’s results. In the house you grew up in. In what happened — or didn’t happen — when things went wrong when you were small.

That’s a longer conversation. It’s also, in my experience, the most important one.

Why it matters

Knowing where you sit on this continuum won’t fix anything by itself. But it gives you something precise to work with.

If you’re NGE — strong internaliser — the question isn’t how to stop being self-critical. It’s how to use that acute eye without turning it into a weapon against yourself.

If you’re FOF — strong externaliser — the question isn’t how to start taking blame. It’s how to stay present in difficulty long enough to let real feedback land.

Both directions have extraordinary capability inside them. The work — the real work — is expanding your range. Becoming someone who can move, rather than someone who is stuck at one end, firing the same response every time the pressure comes.

That’s not personality change. It’s something harder and more interesting than that.

It’s behaviour change.

Research: Claude AI (Anthropic) — Claude Sonnet, April 2026

Written and posted by Paul Roebuck — paulroebuck.co.uk

#NotGoodEnough #FearOfFailure #BehaviourChange #ExecutiveCoaching #Psychotherapy #LeadershipBehaviour #SelfAwareness #UnderPressure #NGE #FOF #ContinuumModel #HumanBehaviour #BoardroomToTherapyRoom #PaulRoebuck #PerformancePsychology #MindsetVsBehaviour #Shame #EmotionalIntelligence #LeadershipDevelopment #CsuiteMindset​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​